I know I just posted two days ago - sorry!
What do we think about goals? Do you shoot for the stars or keep things closer/super obtainable? I appear to have a double standard. In most things I advocate the shoot for the stars. I am a firm believer that attitude goes a long way in helping natural ability - if you aim to make your dreams come true and believe that you can I think you just might do it! (And be extremely proud of what you accomplish in the process!)
That being said, I seem to be creating small, highly obtainable goals for my journey. I gave myself a month to lose 5 pounds, when I knew full well that I had been losing at least 10/month up to this point. Now that I have achieved that goal I am rethinking that goal. Was it too small? Should I have pushed farther? I immediately form another goal upon the completion of one, but normally it is another small one.
I think I keep my journey goals small so that I am almost guaranteed to reach them. There is nothing more aggravating/depressing than working hard at something like this and not meeting your goal. But is it the right way to go about things?
Now that I have reached my goal of "45 pounds down by the end of the year", I have decided to turn it into "47.5 pounds down by the end of the year". Is that too small? Should have I aimed higher?
I suppose I will stick with what is working, but I can't help but feeling the double standard in my goal settings. Any thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment